<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Ugly Better?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://revinity.com/2006/04/is-ugly-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://revinity.com/2006/04/is-ugly-better/</link>
	<description>Design, Music, UX</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 14:52:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shirley</title>
		<link>http://revinity.com/2006/04/is-ugly-better/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Shirley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 16:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://tigerstripe.wordpress.com/2006/04/29/is-ugly-better/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not into design, or architecture in any way, unless words count, so my comment may be way off the mark, but it is sincere and that should count for something. :)
Is it not possible--certainly seems it would be  desirable--to design a structure that is at once functional and beautiful?

Blessings,

Shirley</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not into design, or architecture in any way, unless words count, so my comment may be way off the mark, but it is sincere and that should count for something. <img src='http://revinity.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Is it not possible&#8211;certainly seems it would be  desirable&#8211;to design a structure that is at once functional and beautiful?</p>
<p>Blessings,</p>
<p>Shirley</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
